A 56 year old woman presented with a history of a lump in the breast for 2 weeks. A fine needle aspiration confirmed the diagnosis of breast carcinoma for which she underwent modified radical mastectomy. She has a 3.5cm X 2 cm grade three infiltration duct carcinoma that was ER -ve, PR -ve and HER2 -ve. She had 5 positive axillary nodes with perinodal extension. She was initiated in chemotherapy with FEC (Epirubicin 100mg/mg/m2, Cyclophosphamide 500mg/m2 and 5-Fluorouracil 500mg/m2). She developed tongue pigmentation which increased with each cycle turning the entire tongue bleu-black after four cycles when this picture was taken.
Tag Archives: Health
India along with countries of the Far East, Eastern Europe and Latin America have the highest incidence of gall bladder cancer in the world. Women from Delhi have an incidence of gall bladder cancer of 21.5 pere 100,000 persons, the highest in the world. Only 10-20% of the patients in developed countries have disease localized to the gall bladder at diagnosis. The number in developing countries is expected to be much smaller. Even when the disease is localized, 60% relapse within 5 years of diagnosis. About 80-90% of the patients will need chemotherapy for gall bladder cancer at presentation or at relapse. Chemotherapy is toxic and should only be used in advanced disease if it can achieve cure, prolong survival or relieve symptoms. There are large number patients of gall bladder cancer who need chemotherapy. Do they benefit from chemotherapy?
A study from India (J Clin Oncol 28:4581-4586;2010) compared chemotherapy with best supportive care (a euphemism for no active treatment used in oncology community) and showed that about 30% of the patients respond to chemotherapy. Also, chemotherapy increases the survival twofold. The focus of treatment of gall bladder cancer has been relief of biliary obstruction and symptoms. Chemotherapy will now form an important part of therapy for gall bladder cancer.
A 62 year old male who had been operated for a carcinoma of the rectum presented with pain and distension of the abdomen. The CT scan showed a fluid with a density more than simple fluid and scalloping of the liver. A diagnosis of pseudomyxoma peritonei was made. There was no evidence of a rectal tumour.
The term pseudomyxoma peritonei was used by Werth to describe a patient with ruptured ovarian cystadenoma and gelatinous intraperitoneal material. It is a term used to describe a clinical picture associated with release of intraperitoneal mucin from malignant and benign tumours. The malignant tumours associated with pseudomyxoma peritonei are low grade tumours, usually of the appendicular ovarian origin. The cells produce mucin but have a very low metastatic potential. This results in a predominant intraperitoneal growth resulting in accumulation of mucin and severe abdominal dissention and symptoms.
The CT scan shows scalloping of the liver and spleen. Scalloping is distortion of the liver/spleen margins because of extrinsic pressure of adjacent peritoneal implants without liver parenchymal metastasis. There is ascitic fluid that is slightly denser than simple fluid density. Occasionally amorphous calcifications may be seen. Primary tumour is usually not visible at diagnosis. Scalloping of the liver and ascitic fluid with a greater than fluid density is seen on this scan.
The outcome of pseudomyxoma peritonei depends of the malignant potential and the origin of the tumour responsible for pseudomyxoma. Appendiceal tumours have the best outcome and gastric tumours have the worst outcome. Tumours which show invasive features have a worse outcome.
The disease is treated by surgical debunking. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy may be given. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) or early post-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) may be given. HIPEC is associated with better tolerability, lesser adverse effects and better survival.
Below are images I had taken of a young woman (about 25yrs old). I do not remember what she was admitted for, but if I am not mistaken it was an illness unrelated to Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome (PJD), probably a febrile illness. A colleague of mine asked me if I had seen the circumoral pigmentations of PJD. Fortunately, I had been carrying my Nikon Coolpix 4500 on that day.
PJD is an autosomal dominant disease caused by germline mutations of the gene STK11 (also known as LKB1) located on the short arm of chromosome 19 (19p). It is characterized by mucocutaneous pigmentation, hamartomas of the gastrointestinal tract and a very risk of malignancy. STK11 mutations are not identifiable in about 25% of the patients. These patients are believed to have inactivation of the gene by other mechanisms. About ½ to 1/3rd of the patients have new mutations. The incidence of PJS ranges from 1 in 30,000 to 1:200,000 births
Pigmentation classically involves the lips and buccal mucosa but other areas including hands and feet but may be seen around the nose, orbits anus and genitals. It is caused by melanin. Spots present at birth but may fade with age and adults may not have the spots. About 5% patients do not have pigmentation.
PJS is associated with hamartomatous polyps. Hamartomatous polyps are polyps composed of the normal layers of the intestine but with a markedly distorted architecture. It results from an overgrowth and is not, at least initially, to have a malignant potential. The polyps may be pedunculated or sessile and vary in size from few mm to 3-4 cm. Eighty percent of the patients have jejunal polyps, 40% in the stomach and 40% in the colon. The PJD polyps have no distinctive endoscopic features but can be differentiated from other syndromes by distinctive histopathologic features of arborizing pattern of smooth muscle throughout the polyp. Patients usually present in the second decade of life with abdominal pain, rectal bleeding, anaemia, small intestinal intussusception, bowel obstruction, and rectal prolapse of polyps. Forty to fifty percent of patients need a surgery for polyp related bowel obstruction
From Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome in Familial Cancer Syndromes Editor Douglas L Riegert-Johnson. NCBI 2009
Patients of PJS are at a very high risk of malignancy and the risk is not confined only to the gastrointestinal tract. Almost all patients with PJS will develop a malignancy. PJS increases the risk of small intestinal carcinoma by more than 500 times. The risk of other gastrointestinal cancers, breast cancer, cancer of the uterus and ovary are also increased.
|Cancer||Cumulative Risk*||Relative Risk#|
Data sourced from * Giardiello FM, Trimbath JD. Peutz-Jeghers syndrome and management recommendations. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:408-415.
# Giardiello FM, et al Very high risk of cancer in familial Peutz–Jeghers syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2000 Dec;119(6):1447-53
PJD is treated by polypectomy that may be performed by intraoperative endoscopy or double balloon endoscopy. There are no recommendations for screening patients. The disease is rare and evolving formal recommendations will be difficult. Given below is a graphic compilation of screening recommendations from sources listed by Giardiello and Trimbat (see table above).
Internet resources for PJS include
A 26 year old male patient presented with fever of five days duration. The complete haemogram showed a haemoglobin of 13.2g/dL, WBC count of 13500/mm3 with a differential count of 75% polymorphs, 21% lymphocytes, 2% eosinophils and 2% monocytes and a platelet count of 232,000/mm3. The smear did not show plasmodium and the serology for dengue and HIV was negative. The liver and kidney functions and the X-ray Chest was normal.
A CT scan of the chest was performed which showed mediastinal adenopathy which showed patchy enhancement on injection of contrast. The site was deemed as inaccessible for a biopsy
The patient was initiated on four drug anti-tuberculous therapy. The fever subsided in a week.
About two weeks after discharge the patient has a left sided seizure with unconsciousness. He was admitted to the hospital anti-convulsants given and an MRI of the brain preformed.
The MRI showed multiple ring enhancing lesions in the bilateral fronto-parietal temporal lobes with significant peri-lesional oedema and a significant midline structures to the left due to the right frontoparafalcine lesion.
Lymphoma is a highly curable tumour that mimics tuberculous lymphadenitis. Delay in treatment of high grade lymphomas compromises the chance of cure. Lymph node biopsy is an invasive procedure sometimes needing laparotomies and thoracotomies. The issues that arise when a lymph node is relatively inaccessible are:
Is biopsy needed for all patients with lymphadenopathies?
Patients with lymphadenopathy and an infective/inflammatory pathology in the drained areas need not be biopsied. Patients with inflamed nodes need not be biopsied. Patients with deep seated nodes in whom a certain diagnosis can be made by non-invasive tests need not be biopsied. All other patients should be biopsied. FNAC, unless it yields a specific diagnosis, is an inadequate investigation for lymphadenopathy. An excision biopsy is ideal. A large wedge biopsy is acceptable for large nodes and a trucut biopsy is appropriate for deep seated nodes. Many patients have succumbed to an advanced lymphoma because of delayed diagnosis from an inappropriate or inadequate biopsy. From the pathologists point of view the diagnosis of lymphoma may be one of the most challenging. Not everyone is experienced enough to make the diagnosis. Even the experienced pathologists can only report on the material provided. Providing appropriate material is the responsibility of the clinician. When one is treating on a clinical diagnosis the patients needs a close monitoring for signs of treatment failure and an alternative diagnosis.
Is there a blood test for the diagnosis of lymphomas?
Lymphomas are of two types Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin. Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma is a collection of about 30 distinct malignancies of the lymphoid cells. Non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas have a leukaemic phase i.e. the phase when the malignant cells spill into the blood. Leukaemic phase occurs early in the course of the disease in patients with low grade lymphomas e.g. small lymphocytic lymphoma, follicular lymphomas and splenic marginal zone lymphomas and very high grade lymphomas e.g. Burkitt’s lymphoma and lymphoblastic lymphoma. The leukaemic phase of small lymphocytic lymphoma is chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and that of very high grade lymphomas is acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Blood tests can only diagnose lymphomas which are in the leukaemic phase. There are no other blood tests for the diagnosis of lymphomas
Does an MRI scan differentiate a lymphoma from tuberculosis?
A tuberculous granuloma caseates resulting in ring enhancement and oedema around the lesion. The other ring enhancing lesions include primary brain tumour (glioblastoma), metastasis (especially post chemotherapy), abscess, Toxoplasma and Cryptococcus in HIV, resolving hematoma (10-21 days), radiation necrosis, and aneurysm. The MRI features of a primary CNS lymphoma in an immune competent host are quite distinct. The tumour is isointense on T1 and show pronounced uniform enhancement and very little peri-lesional oedema. Ring enhancement is seen rarely. In immunocompromised patients ring enhancement, multiple lesions, spontaneous haemorrhage and non-enhancing lesions are common making it difficult to distinguish CNS lymphoma from infections in these patients. A patient with high index of suspicion of lymphoma must undergo a biopsy.
Could these CNS lesions be from a lymphoma?
The MRI picture is inconsistent with a lymphoma in an immune competent patient. Synchronous CNS and systemic lymphomas are very rare and have been reported only in immunocompromised patients. One report of AIDS related lymphomas described synchronous CNS involvement in 5/19 patients (Annals of Oncology 18 (Supplement 9): ix178–ix182, 2007, abstract 71). Synchronous CNS involvement has also been described in a child with immunodeficiency J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2008 Apr;30(4):317-9. Isolated CNS relapse from a lymphoma is seen in less than 1% of the patients. This patient was treated as tuberculosis.
The risk of prostate cancer increases with age. Men aged 50 or less have a risk of less than one in 30000. This rises to one in 625 for men above the age of 75 years. The corresponding figures for the USA are one in 476 and one in 9 and Japan are one in 31250 and one in 444. The US rates are about 70 times more than Mumbai or Japan.
Race and environmental factors appear to play an important role in prostate cancer. The table below shows the prostate cancer incidence in the US in 2010. The prostate cancer incidence (per 100,000 population) in the US increased from 94.02 in 1975 to 237.21 in 1992 before settling down to 163.06 in 2006. In the same period the annual death rates increased from 30.97 to 39.22 before finally settling down to 23.56. The five year survival which was 68.9 in 1975-1977 increased to 99.9 in 1999-2005. What were the reasons for this apparent epidemic of prostate cancer?
Early diagnosis of cancer means better cure. Screening tests, tests that are performed on individuals with no symptoms to detect occult cancer, are used with the hope of improve the survival of cancer patients. The Pap smear for carcinoma cervix, mammography for breast carcinoma and stool occult blood testing for early detection of colorectal carcinoma are few such tests. Prostatic specific antigen (PSA) is a protein exclusively produced by the prostate gland. PSA estimations with digital rectal examination are used to screen for prostate cancer.
Before the introduction of prostate cancer screening, a large number of patients with prostate cancer presented with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Only palliative treatment could be offered to these patients. Use of PSA has increased the detection rate of prostate cancer and has been responsible for the increase in the incidence of prostate cancer seen during and after the 1990s. Patients whose prostate cancer is detected by PSA screening have smaller and lower grade disease. The disease is more often restricted to the prostate allowing curative treatment. There is also a belief that some cancer so detected would never have caused a problem.
Is there evidence from clinical trials to support the contention that early diagnosis of prostate cancer means better treatment? Why do you need evidence to support something that is so obvious and common sense? It is necessary to understand the cost of a positive screening test.
Sensitivity is the number of patients with a disease who have a positive test. A sensitivity of 100% means no individual with disease has a negative result. The primary aim of a screening test is not to miss out any individual with disease. An individual who is declared to be free of disease by a screening test would become complacent, take symptoms lightly and is likely to present with advanced cancer. A screening test needs to be very sensitive to ensure that no individual with disease is declared disease-free.
Sensitive tests overdiagnose. Specificity of a test determines how many individuals the test diagnoses incorrectly as having disease. A specificity of 100% means there is no incorrect diagnosis. In practice there are tradeoffs between sensitivity and specificity. Sensitive tests tend to be less specific. A disease like cancer needs to be diagnosed with certainty before treatment is initiated. A confirmatory test needs to be performed in patients with a positive screening test to make a definitive diagnosis of cancer. The confirmatory tests come with costs, discomfort and risks.
A positive PSA is followed by a rectal ultrasound and multiple transrectal biopsy of the prostate. Even if the results of confirmatory tests are negative, patients worry about being diagnosed prostate cancer (J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Jul;21(7):715-21). Prostatic biopsy is associated with fever, pain, hematospermia, hematuria, positive urine cultures, and rarely sepsis (Urology. 2002 Nov;60(5):826-30). Finally, radical proctectomy, the treatment for localized prostate cancer, is associated with incontinence and sexual dysfunction. The critical question given the risks, complication and cost of confirmatory tests and therapeutic intervention is, does prostate cancer screening reduce mortality?
Many trials evaluating the ability of PSA and digital rectal examination to reduce prostate cancer mortality have been conducted, with conflicting results. One of the recently published studies, the ERSPC study, one of the studies with a positive result, concluded that 1410 men would have to be screened, and an additional 48 men would have to be treated (N Engl J Med 2009; 360:1320-1328) to prevent one prostate cancer related death. In societies with a lower incidence prostate cancer the number to be screened would be higher. This trial showed a 20% reduction in prostate cancer related mortality by screening. All experts agree on two issues. The benefits of prostate cancer screening, if any, are seen after a prolonged period (10 years or more) and the harms are apparent immediately.
Some prostate cancers, the low grade and small ones, will never cause problem and may not need treatment. Prostate cancer is a disease of the elderly, a group that suffers from other chronic illnesses like diabetes, hypertension, heart disease and stroke. Many patients with low grade prostate cancer would die with the prostate cancer rather than of prostate cancer. The focus in these patients needs should be the co-morbidity. As oncologists understand indolent prostate tumours better and are able to target treatment to those who are likely to succumb to prostate cancer, the impact of prostate cancer screening will become more evident. We are moving towards that goal but are not there.
What do we tell our patients? The American Cancer Society recommends a digital rectal examination and PSA beginning from the age of 50 years. Having a brother or a father with prostate cancer doubles the risk of prostate cancer and having two or more first degree relatives increases the risk seven to eight fold. These patients need to be screened from an earlier age (40 or 45 years). The patients must be informed that screening will result in further tests that can cause morbidity. The benefits if any would not be seen for at least 10 years after starting screening. The morbidity of the tests will on the other hand be immediate. Patients with less than 10 years to live should not be screened.
Finally, with so much controversy about prostate cancer screening, one wonders if what physicians practice and preach are different. Yes, physicians practice what they preach. About 95% of male urologists and 78% of primary care physicians who are 50 years of age or older report that they have had a PSA test themselves (J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Mar;21(3):257-9).